UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
Commission file number 0-7647
HAWKINS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MINNESOTA |
41-0771293 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3100 EAST HENNEPIN AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(612) 331-6910
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer o |
Accelerated Filer x |
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
CLASS |
OUTSTANDING AT NOVEMBER 9, 2006 |
Common Stock, par value $.05 per share |
10,171,496 |
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
|
|
Page |
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Balance Sheets September 30, 2006 and April 2, 2006 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income - Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 | |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
8 |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
12 | |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
12 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
13 | |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
13 | |
|
|
|
Item 6. |
13 | |
|
|
|
|
14 | |
|
|
|
|
15 | |
|
|
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
SEPTEMBER 30, |
|
APRIL 2, |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,391,315 |
|
$ |
6,330,004 |
|
Investments available-for-sale |
|
|
13,858,844 |
|
|
14,167,047 |
|
Trade receivables - net |
|
|
16,703,276 |
|
|
16,185,560 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14,662,633 |
|
|
10,449,671 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,599,019 |
|
|
2,314,458 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
52,215,087 |
|
|
49,446,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT net |
|
|
35,479,455 |
|
|
34,721,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - less accumulated amortization of $1,530,900 and $1,418,491, respectively |
|
|
1,952,133 |
|
|
2,064,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS |
|
|
4,483,421 |
|
|
5,658,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
2,215,989 |
|
|
2,165,372 |
|
|
|
$ |
96,346,085 |
|
$ |
94,056,734 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade |
|
$ |
6,660,068 |
|
$ |
8,695,396 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
2,240,041 |
|
|
2,034,299 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
4,227,899 |
|
|
4,426,356 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,895,710 |
|
|
2,411,676 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,023,718 |
|
|
17,567,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
121,501 |
|
|
127,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
316,824 |
|
|
265,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share; 10,171,496 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
508,575 |
|
|
508,575 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
37,056,103 |
|
|
37,056,103 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(46,117 |
) |
|
(125,754 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
42,365,481 |
|
|
38,657,115 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
79,884,042 |
|
|
76,096,039 |
|
|
|
$ |
96,346,085 |
|
$ |
94,056,734 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
3
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
| ||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
| ||||
|
|
(UNAUDITED) |
|
(UNAUDITED) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
42,200,162 |
|
$ |
36,643,242 |
|
$ |
83,660,825 |
|
$ |
72,497,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
31,023,515 |
|
|
27,848,289 |
|
|
61,661,093 |
|
|
53,817,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
11,176,647 |
|
|
8,794,953 |
|
|
21,999,732 |
|
|
18,680,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6,482,276 |
|
|
5,189,914 |
|
|
13,119,141 |
|
|
11,088,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,015,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,015,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
4,694,371 |
|
|
4,620,865 |
|
|
8,880,591 |
|
|
8,608,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
347,757 |
|
|
68,654 |
|
|
649,004 |
|
|
376,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,042,128 |
|
|
4,689,519 |
|
|
9,529,595 |
|
|
8,985,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
1,688,600 |
|
|
3,583,500 |
|
|
3,234,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,146,128 |
|
$ |
3,000,919 |
|
$ |
5,946,095 |
|
$ |
5,750,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
10,171,496 |
|
|
10,227,209 |
|
|
10,171,496 |
|
|
10,222,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
10,171,496 |
|
|
10,251,181 |
|
|
10,171,496 |
|
|
10,247,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
4
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
| ||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
| ||
|
|
(UNAUDITED) |
| ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,946,095 |
|
$ |
5,750,405 |
|
Reconciliation to cash flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,878,365 |
|
|
1,748,441 |
|
Restricted stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
198,702 |
|
Intangible assets impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
176,000 |
|
Impairment of investments |
|
|
30,595 |
|
|
211,859 |
|
Loss from property disposals |
|
|
66,446 |
|
|
37,645 |
|
Changes in operating accounts (using) providing cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(517,716 |
) |
|
(1,325,645 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(4,212,962 |
) |
|
(7,224,453 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,758,173 |
) |
|
4,227,617 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
281,746 |
|
|
(480,950 |
) |
Other |
|
|
493,761 |
|
|
(352,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,208,157 |
|
|
2,966,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(2,859,147 |
) |
|
(3,504,076 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,068,577 |
) |
Sale and maturities of investments |
|
|
1,588,710 |
|
|
3,266,641 |
|
Proceeds from property disposals |
|
|
74,494 |
|
|
9,631 |
|
Payments received on notes receivable |
|
|
83,396 |
|
|
77,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,112,547 |
) |
|
(2,219,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(2,034,299 |
) |
|
(1,846,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,034,299 |
) |
|
(1,846,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(938,689 |
) |
|
(1,099,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
6,330,004 |
|
|
4,564,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
5,391,315 |
|
$ |
3,465,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,823,000 |
|
$ |
2,714,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing activities- |
|
$ |
267,042 |
|
$ |
642,423 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, accordingly, do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. All adjustments made to the interim financial statements were of a normal recurring nature. |
|
|
|
The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 1 to the Companys financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006 filed with the Commission on June 16, 2006. |
|
|
2. |
The results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. |
|
|
3. |
Inventories, principally valued by the LIFO method, are less than current cost by approximately $3,374,000 and $3,859,000 at September 30, 2006 and April 2, 2006, respectively. Inventory consists principally of finished goods. |
|
|
4. |
Comprehensive income and its components, net of tax, were as follows: |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,146,128 |
|
$ |
3,000,919 |
|
$ |
5,946,095 |
|
$ |
5,750,405 |
|
Available-for-sale investments unrealized gain |
|
|
80,449 |
|
|
62,672 |
|
|
79,637 |
|
|
84,522 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,226,577 |
|
$ |
3,063,591 |
|
$ |
6,025,732 |
|
$ |
5,834,927 |
|
5. |
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company will be required to recognize in its financial statements the largest tax benefit of a tax position that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained on audit based solely on the technical merits of the position as of the reporting date. The term more-likely-than-not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on new disclosure requirements, reporting and accrual of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and transition. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold at that date may be recognized. The cumulative effect of initially applying FIN No. 48 will be recognized as a change in accounting principle as of the end of the period in which FIN No. 48 is adopted. The Company has begun an evaluation of the impact of applying this interpretation as of April 2, 2007, which will be the effective date of the interpretation for the Company. |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit plan in the statement of financial position, requires that changes in the funded status be recognized through comprehensive income and expands disclosures. SFAS No. 158 is effective for the Company for the fiscal year end April 1, 2007. The Company does not expect a material impact as a result of adopting SFAS No. 158 on its financial statements. |
6
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company starting in fiscal 2009. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, the adoption of this statement will have on its financial statements. |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108), to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that the Company quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective as of the end of our 2007 fiscal year, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB 108. The Company does not expect the impact of adopting SAB 108 to have a material impact on its financial statements. |
|
|
6. |
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company paid $3.0 million to resolve a personal injury lawsuit encaptioned Chavarria et al v. Hawkins, Inc., Panorama Compounding Pharmacy, and Valley Drug and Compounding, et al that arose from the alleged mislabeling of certain inventory the Company purchased in connection with its acquisition of St. Marys Chemicals, Inc. (d/b/a Universal Chemicals) in May 2000. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Company denied all liability and reserved its right to pursue indemnification and contribution from third parties. In July 2004, the Company filed suit in Hennepin County, Minnesota against the former principals of Universal Chemicals, seeking indemnification for the costs the Company incurred in defending and resolving the prior litigation. On June 23, 2005, the Company and the former Universal Chemicals principals (the defendants) executed a settlement agreement in full and final resolution of the Companys claims, as well as any claims the defendants may have or may have had against the Company. The settlement agreement required the defendants to surrender to the Company 75,358 shares of the Companys common stock, which they received as consideration for the May 2000 acquisition. The agreement also terminated the non-competition provisions of the Companys agreements with the defendants, relieving the Company of the obligation to pay $500,000 to the defendants over the next five years as consideration for these provisions. The settlement agreement called for the parties to execute mutual releases and a stipulation of dismissal. Litigation settlement income of $1,015,826 was recorded in the Pharmaceutical segment during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as the Company received the 75,358 shares and the executed final releases and stipulations.
The Company is involved in various legal actions arising from the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any judgment or settlement resulting from pending or threatened litigation would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. The Company has two leases of land, and at the end of the lease term (currently 2018 if the leases are not renewed), the Company has a specified amount of time to remove the equipment and buildings. At the end of the specified amount of time, anything that remains on the land becomes the property of the lessor, and the lessor has the option to either maintain the property or remove the property at the Companys expense. The Company has not been able to reasonably estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligations, primarily due to the combination of the following factors: the leases do not expire in the near future; the Company has a history of extending the leases with the lessor and currently intends to do so at expiration of this lease period; the lessor does not have a history of terminating leases with its tenants; and because it is more likely than not that the buildings will have value at the end of the lease life and therefore, may not be removed by either the lessee or the lessor. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, and FASB Interpretation 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations- an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, the Company has not recorded an asset retirement obligation as of September 30, 2006. The Company will continue to monitor the factors surrounding the requirement to record an asset retirement obligation and will recognize the fair value of a liability in the period in which it is incurred and a reasonable estimate can be made. |
7
7. |
The Company has three reportable segments: Industrial, Water Treatment and Pharmaceutical. Reportable segments are defined by product and type of customer. Segments are responsible for the sales, marketing and development of their products and services. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Product costs and expenses for each segment are based on actual costs incurred along with cost allocation of shared and centralized functions. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including nonrecurring gains and losses. The segments do not have separate accounting, administration, customer service or purchasing functions. There are no intersegment sales. Sales are primarily within the United States and all assets are located within the United States. |
Reportable Segments |
|
Industrial |
|
Water Treatment |
|
Pharmaceutical* |
|
|
Total |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
23,027,848 |
|
$ |
16,718,530 |
|
$ |
2,453,784 |
|
$ |
42,200,162 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
4,981,466 |
|
|
5,417,211 |
|
|
777,970 |
|
|
11,176,647 |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
1,193,901 |
|
$ |
3,376,603 |
|
$ |
123,867 |
|
$ |
4,694,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
19,830,558 |
|
$ |
14,269,585 |
|
$ |
2,543,099 |
|
$ |
36,643,242 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
3,520,031 |
|
|
4,549,278 |
|
|
725,644 |
|
|
8,794,953 |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
581,513 |
|
$ |
2,872,473 |
|
$ |
1,166,879 |
|
$ |
4,620,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
46,427,190 |
|
$ |
32,387,247 |
|
$ |
4,846,388 |
|
$ |
83,660,825 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
10,084,770 |
|
|
10,415,231 |
|
|
1,499,731 |
|
|
21,999,732 |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
2,482,655 |
|
$ |
6,248,803 |
|
$ |
149,133 |
|
$ |
8,880,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
39,686,880 |
|
$ |
27,745,092 |
|
$ |
5,065,797 |
|
$ |
72,497,769 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
7,981,908 |
|
|
9,200,265 |
|
|
1,498,438 |
|
|
18,680,611 |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
1,863,883 |
|
$ |
5,642,710 |
|
$ |
1,101,534 |
|
$ |
8,608,127 |
|
* The Pharmaceutical segment recorded $1,015,826 in pretax gain from the litigation settlement during the three months ended September 30, 2005.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 contains statements that we believe to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, believe, project, or continue, or the negative thereof or similar words. From time to time, we also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any public statements we make could be materially different from actual results. They can be affected by assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties, including those described in Item 1A Risk Factors and other factors disclosed throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Companys other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Consequently, we cannot guarantee any forward-looking statements and undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Investors should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all factors that might affect actual results and should not consider these factors to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. We assume no obligation and disclaim any duty to update the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or any other public statement.
8
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of certain items to sales for the period indicated (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sales |
|
$ |
42,200 |
|
100. |
0% |
|
$ |
83,661 |
|
100. |
0% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
31,024 |
|
73. |
5 |
|
|
61,661 |
|
73. |
7 |
Gross margin |
|
|
11,177 |
|
26. |
5 |
|
|
22,000 |
|
26. |
3 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6,482 |
|
15. |
4 |
|
|
13,119 |
|
15. |
7 |
Income from operations |
|
|
4,694 |
|
11. |
1 |
|
|
8,881 |
|
10. |
6 |
Investment income |
|
|
348 |
|
0. |
8 |
|
|
649 |
|
0. |
8 |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,042 |
|
11. |
9 |
|
|
9,530 |
|
11. |
4 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,896 |
|
4. |
5 |
|
|
3,584 |
|
4. |
3 |
Net income |
|
$ |
3,146 |
|
7. |
5% |
|
$ |
5,946 |
|
7. |
1% |
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
36,643 |
|
100. |
0% |
|
$ |
72,498 |
|
100. |
0% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
27,848 |
|
76. |
0 |
|
|
53,817 |
|
74. |
2 |
Gross margin |
|
|
8,795 |
|
24. |
0 |
|
|
18,681 |
|
25. |
8 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
5,190 |
|
14. |
2 |
|
|
11,088 |
|
15. |
3 |
Litigation settlement |
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
(2. |
8) |
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
(1. |
4) |
Income from operations |
|
|
4,621 |
|
12. |
6 |
|
|
8,608 |
|
11. |
9 |
Investment income |
|
|
69 |
|
0. |
2 |
|
|
377 |
|
0. |
5 |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,690 |
|
12. |
8 |
|
|
8,985 |
|
12. |
4 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,689 |
|
4. |
6 |
|
|
3,235 |
|
4. |
5 |
Net income |
|
$ |
3,001 |
|
8. |
2% |
|
$ |
5,750 |
|
7. |
9% |
Sales increased $5,556,920, or 15.2%, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, and increased $11,163,056, or 15.4%, in the six months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods a year ago. The change was primarily attributable to an increase in sales of non-bulk chemicals. Sales of bulk chemicals, including caustic soda, were approximately 36.4% and 35.1% of sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to 38.0% and 36.5% in the comparable periods a year ago. Industrial segment sales increased by $3,197,290 in the three months ended September 30, 2006 and increased by $6,740,310 in the six-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable periods in fiscal 2006. The Industrial segments sales increase was related to increased sales within existing product lines. Caustic soda volumes sold were comparable to the prior year periods. Water Treatment segment sales increased by $2,448,945 in the three months ended September 30, 2006 and increased $4,642,155 in the six-month period ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2006. These increases were primarily attributable to selling price increases associated with increases in material costs and an increase in volumes sold to existing customers. Pharmaceutical sales decreased by 3.5% to $2,453,784 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and decreased by 4.3% to $4,846,388 for the six months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2006 due to changes in product mix.
Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 was 26.5% and 26.3%, respectively, compared to 24.0% and 25.8%, respectively, for the comparable periods of fiscal 2006. For the Industrial segment, gross margin, as a percentage of sales, was 21.6% and 17.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively, and 21.7% for the six months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 20.1% for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The improvement was partially attributable to an improved product mix during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Additionally, due to the LIFO method of valuing inventory, the margin was positively impacted by changes in the cost of caustic soda and changes in inventory levels. Many of the Companys products are commodity based and therefore are subject to fluctuations, which is expected to continue in future periods. By attempting to maintain relatively stable dollar margins, the gross margin percentage will decrease when the product costs are increasing and will increase when product costs are decreasing. Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, for the Water Treatment segment was 32.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 31.9% in the comparable period of fiscal 2006 and 32.2% for the six-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to 33.2% for the comparable period of fiscal 2006. The improvement during the three months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to higher volumes sold and changes in product mix. Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, for the Pharmaceutical segment was 31.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 28.5% in the comparable period of fiscal 2006 and was 30.9% for the six months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 29.6% for the same period a year ago. The increases are primarily related to changes in product mix.
9
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 were 15.4% ($6,482,276) and 15.7% ($13,119,141), respectively, compared to 14.2% ($5,189,914) and 15.3% ($11,088,310) for the comparable periods a year ago. The dollar increases were mainly due to consulting and contractor fees associated with the Companys implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Employee compensation and benefits comprise the majority of the selling, general and administrative expenditures.
INVESTMENT INCOME
Investment income increased by $272,126 for the six months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period one year ago. The increase was primarily due to a loss of $211,859 recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 related to a decline in the market value of an investment which was deemed other than temporary and a higher rate of return on the Companys cash equivalents and marketable securities.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The effective income tax rate was 37.6% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 compared to 36.0% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2005.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
For the six-month period ended September 30, 2006, cash provided by operations was $2,208,157 compared to $2,966,692 for the same period one year ago. The decrease related primarily to the timing of vendor payments in comparison to the prior year. Cash used in investing activities decreased by $1,106,829 primarily due to a decrease in capital expenditures as compared to the comparable period a year ago. Capital expenditures during the six months ended September 30, 2006 consisted primarily of facility improvement projects and ERP-related additions. Capital expenditures for the remainder of this fiscal year are expected to be relatively comparable with the three previous years and are expected to relate primarily to facilities improvement projects.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments available-for-sale decreased by $2,426,857 from April 2, 2006 to $23,363,535 as of September 30, 2006 due primarily to dividends paid of $2,034,299 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2006. Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts and certificates of deposit with an original maturity of three months or less. Investments available-for-sale consists of investment contracts with high-rated, stable insurance companies; marketable securities consisting of corporate and municipal bonds; U.S. Government agency securities and a mutual fund carried at fair value. The Companys investment objectives in order of importance are the preservation of principal, maintenance of liquidity and rate of return. The fixed income portfolio consists primarily of investment grade securities to minimize credit risk, and they generally mature within 10 years. The Company invests in a mutual fund with characteristics similar to its fixed income portfolio to enhance its investment portfolio diversification. The Company monitors the maturities of its investments to ensure that funding is available for anticipated cash needs. At September 30, 2006, $4,113,376 of available-for-sale investments were classified as non-current assets as they were determined to be temporarily impaired and have maturity dates of one year or longer. These investments were not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired as the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a period of time sufficient to allow a recovery of fair value. Expected future cash flows from operations, cash equivalents and investments included within current assets are expected to fund the Companys short-term working capital needs.
At September 30, 2006, the Company had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities of $7,286,929, a mutual fund of $7,549,434, and $8,897,217 classified as cash and cash equivalents and variable rate securities. The fixed income securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. However, while the value of the investment may fluctuate in any given period, the Company intends to hold its fixed income investments until maturity. Consequently, the Company would not expect to recognize an adverse impact on net income or cash flows or the amount ultimately realized on the investment. The value of the mutual fund, like all mutual funds, may increase or decrease due to market volatility. The Company recorded losses of $30,595 and $211,859 during the six months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due to declines in market value that were deemed other than temporary. The mutual fund held by the Company as of September 30, 2006 is a short-term bond fund that invests primarily in investment grade securities.
Expected future cash flows from operations, coupled with the Companys strong financial position, puts the Company in a position to fund both short and long-term working capital and capital investment needs with internally generated funds. Management does not, therefore, anticipate the need to engage in significant financing activities in either the short or long-term. If the need to obtain additional capital does arise, however, management is confident that the Companys total debt to capital ratio at September 30, 2006 puts it in a position to obtain debt financing on favorable terms.
10
Although management continually reviews opportunities to enhance the value of the Company through strategic acquisitions, other capital investments and strategic divestitures, no material commitments for such investments or divestitures currently exist.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 1 to the Companys financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006. The accounting policies used in preparing the Companys interim fiscal 2007 financial statements are the same as those described in the Companys Annual Report.
In preparing the financial statements, the Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company re-evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis. The Companys estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company considers the following policies to involve the most judgment in the preparation of the Companys financial statements.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when title passes to our customers, which occurs primarily when product has been shipped, if there is evidence that the customer has agreed to purchase the products, performance has occurred, the price and terms of sale are fixed, and collection of the receivable is reasonably assured.
Investments Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 59, Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, and FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 115-1 and FAS No. 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments provide guidance on determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. Investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment. This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost; the general market conditions, including factors such as industry and sector performance, rating agency actions, and our intent and ability to hold the investment. Investments with an indicator are further evaluated to determine the likelihood of a significant adverse effect on the fair value and amount of the impairment as necessary. If market, industry and/or investee conditions deteriorate, we may incur future impairments.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Substantially all of the Companys receivables are due from customers located in the United States. The estimated allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the age of the outstanding receivables and the payment history and credit worthiness of each customer. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts on a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance that our estimates will match actual amounts ultimately written off.
Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the inventory quantities on hand to estimated future usage and sales and, if necessary, writes down the value of inventory deemed obsolete or excess to market. Though management considers these reserves adequate and proper, changes in sales volumes due to unexpected economic or competitive conditions are among the factors that could materially affect the adequacy of this reserve.
LIFO Reserve Inventories are primarily valued with cost being determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. We may incur significant fluctuations in our gross margins due primarily to changes in the cost of a single, large-volume component of inventory. The price of this inventory component may vary depending on the balance between supply and demand. Management reviews the LIFO reserve on a quarterly basis.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets, including intangible assets subject to amortization and property, plant, and equipment, when events and changes in circumstances warrant such a review, such as prolonged industry downturn or significant reductions in projected future cash flows. The carrying value of long-lived assets is considered impaired when the projected future undiscounted cash flows from such assets are less than their carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Significant judgments and assumptions are required in the forecast of future operating results used in the preparation of the estimated future cash flows. We periodically review the appropriateness of the estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets. Changes in these estimates could have a material effect on the assessment of long-lived assets.
11
Self Insurance The Company purchases insurance for employee medical benefits. Third party insurance is carried for what is believed to be the major portion of potential exposures that would exceed the Companys self-insured retentions. The Company has established a liability for potential uninsured claims. The Company considers factors such as known outstanding claims, historical experience, and other relevant factors in setting the liability. These reserves are monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Though management considers these balances adequate, a substantial change in the number and/or severity of claims could result in materially different amounts for this item.
Income Taxes In the preparation of the Companys financial statements, management calculates income taxes. This includes estimating the current tax liability as well as assessing temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and book accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet. These assets and liabilities are analyzed regularly and management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established to the extent that management believes that recovery is not likely. Reserves are also established for potential and ongoing audits of federal and state tax issues. The Company routinely monitors the potential impact of such situations and believes that it is properly reserved. Valuations related to amounts owed and tax rates could be impacted by changes to tax codes, changes in statutory tax rates, the Companys future taxable income levels and the results of tax audits.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
At September 30, 2006, the Company had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities of $7,286,929, a mutual fund of $7,549,434, investment contracts of $3,505,902 and cash and cash equivalents of $5,391,315. The fixed income securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risks and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. However, while the value of the investment may fluctuate in any given period, the Company intends to hold its fixed income investments until maturity. Consequently, the Company would not expect to recognize an adverse impact on net income or cash flows during the holding period. The value of the mutual fund, like all mutual funds, may increase or decrease due to market volatility. The mutual fund consists primarily of U.S. Government securities. The investment contracts are variable rate contracts with high-rated, stable insurance companies that reset on a quarterly basis. A hypothetical 1% change in rates would impact investment income by approximately $35,000, based upon the amount of variable rate investment contracts held at September 30, 2006. The Company adjusts the carrying value of its investments down if an impairment occurs that is other than temporary.
The Company is subject to the risk inherent in the cyclical nature of commodity chemical prices. However, the Company does not currently purchase forward contracts or otherwise engage in hedging activities with respect to the purchase of commodity chemicals. We generally attempt to pass changes in material prices to our customers, however, there are no assurances that we will be able to pass on the increases in the future.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of our published financial statements and other disclosures included in this report. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2006 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2006 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control
During the quarter, there was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. In October 2006, the Company implemented a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Operation of the ERP system may result in unexpected cost or difficulties, including failure or inefficient operation of the new system. A failure in the new system could impair our ability to access certain business and financial information. The Company has not completed testing of the new system in operation, including the required assessment of internal controls over financial reporting. ERP systems are highly complex and as a result of the implementation there are significant changes in our internal controls, processes and procedures. As a result, the operation of the ERP system could cause a material adverse effect on our internal control environment, our business, financial condition and results of operation.
12
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to the Companys risk factors from those disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006, except for the following: In October 2006, the Company implemented a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Operation of the ERP system may result in unexpected cost or difficulties, including failure or inefficient operation of the new system. A failure in the new system could impair our ability to access certain business and financial information. The Company has not completed testing of the new system in operation, including the required assessment of internal controls over financial reporting. ERP systems are highly complex and as a result of the implementation there are significant changes in our internal controls, processes and procedures. As a result, the operation of the ERP system could cause a material adverse effect on our internal control environment, our business, financial condition and results of operation.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company was held on August 3, 2006. Proxies for the annual meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act. There was no solicitation in opposition to the Board of Director nominees listed in the proxy statement and all of the nominees for director were elected with the following votes:
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker |
John R. Hawkins |
|
8,167,564 |
|
243,519 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Howard M. Hawkins |
|
8,167,501 |
|
243,582 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
John S. McKeon |
|
8,127,787 |
|
283,296 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Duane M. Jergenson |
|
8,348,397 |
|
62,686 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
G. Robert Gey |
|
8,348,266 |
|
62,817 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Daryl I. Skaar |
|
8,305,889 |
|
105,194 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Eapen Chacko |
|
8,346,297 |
|
64,786 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Exhibit Index
Exhibit |
Description |
Method of Filing |
3.1 |
Amended and Second Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through February 27, 2001. (1) |
Incorporated by Reference |
3.2 |
Second Amended and Superseding By-Laws as amended through February 15, 1995. (2) |
Incorporated by Reference |
31.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
Filed Electronically |
31.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
Filed Electronically |
32.1 |
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer. |
Filed Electronically |
32.2 |
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer. |
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 1, 1995. |
13
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
HAWKINS, INC. | |
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marvin E. Dee |
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
Dated: November 9, 2006
14
Exhibit |
Description |
Method of Filing |
3.1 |
Amended and Second Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through February 27, 2001. (1) |
Incorporated by Reference |
3.2 |
Second Amended and Superseding By-Laws as amended through February 15, 1995. (2) |
Incorporated by Reference |
31.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
Filed Electronically |
31.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
Filed Electronically |
32.1 |
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer. |
Filed Electronically |
32.2 |
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer. |
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 1, 1995. |
15
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John R. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of Hawkins, Inc., certify that:
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hawkins, Inc.; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
5. |
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 9, 2006
|
/s/ John R. Hawkins |
|
John R. Hawkins |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Marvin E. Dee, Chief Financial Officer of Hawkins, Inc., certify that:
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hawkins, Inc.; |
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
5. |
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 9, 2006
|
/s/ Marvin E. Dee |
|
Marvin E. Dee |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ John R. Hawkins |
John R. Hawkins |
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marvin E. Dee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Marvin E. Dee |
Marvin E. Dee |